{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
+1 917 8105386 [email protected]

Censoring of information in the classroom is an essential component in the making of
academics relevant through restricting the use of some information or making some information
available. Uncensored information may prove difficult for some students to understand and be
inappropriate for students of particular ages. An instance of uncensored information is a teacher
explaining a high school concept to primary school children. Hence, censoring information
allows for the easing of academics and a progressive understanding of classroom relevant
Affirmative Case

  1. Proposition:
    The state of California must find an approach to censor information given to learners in
    classrooms to prevent inappropriate age and unethical information from censored books.
  2. Context:
    After a lengthy debate, the state decided to make policies that constrain and restrict the use
    of censored books from the website.
  3. Harms:
    a. Immoral information exposure- underage children may be exposed to information
    not relevant for their age
    b. Mis-information- students may miss understanding some information leading to
    wrong actions and wrong applying of this information
  4. Inherency:
    a. School Shutdowns- inappropriate information may lead to cases by parents
    leading shutting down of the school
    a. Risk of loss of careers- The tutor not following the set academic policies will
    face cancelling of their academic privileges and tarnishing their careers.
  5. Plan: See proposition
  6. Solvency:
    a. Control information exposure- through the set inherency, caution will be taken to ensure
    only appropriate information is given. (Gustavsson, 2018)
    b. Set policies- through standards and procedures, it will be possible to gauge and control
    learning processes hence only academic relevant information.
  7. Advantages:
    a. Misinterpretation controlled- with controlled information output, the
    misunderstanding by students will be controlled.
    b. Teaches good practice- learners and teachers will understand how to gauge
    information based on relevancy and appropriateness to prevent the use of
    censored information.
    Negative Response:
  8. Opposition to affirmative plan: The state to allow the use of any type of academic
    information as long as it is relevant to the course at hand.
  9. Context: As much as there is censorship of information in academics, some information
    may be essential in ensuring the children get a complete understanding of some concepts
    but in a limited manner to limit harm and have a positive impact.
  10. Harms:
    a. Access to inappropriate information- if all resources are allowed in schools,
    children may get confused, have access to inappropriate data, and significantly
    impact their academics (Caskinett, 2020).
    b. Difficulty in understanding concepts- the lack of censorship may make some
    information challenging to conceptualize for young students hindering their
    academic progress
  11. Inherency:
    a. If no plans happen- academic stagnation and risk of school closure in cases of
    b. If the affirmative plan happens- the learning environment will remain less than
    optimal due to the lack of a coherent and appropriate mode of information
  12. Counterplan: see opposition to an affirmative pla
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Support Supervisor