Topic: Implementation of Safety Best Practices to reduce medication errors in (In-Patient) Facility Order Description answer the following questions 1. Provide a brief description of your organisation (You can use the following information) Overview: Excellence Hospital started in Jumeirah in 2003. Over the past twelve years, EH established a strong brand known for quality, safety, and commitment to excellence. EH physicians and surgeons are amongst the best in Dubai and they are highly credentialed and the majority of them are Western trained with American or European Board certification. Hospital Statistics: 18 outpatient clinics including a 24 hour walk-in urgent care clinic 4 operating theatres 11 IP beds, 8 recovery beds plus 1 prep bed, 2 ICU beds, 3 urgent care beds In patient pharmacy, laboratory, conventional x-rays, mammography, ultrasounds 18,500 SF of space plus four adjacent villas used for administrative purposes (finance, IT, Insurance, marketing, etc.) 2.0: Mission: Our mission is to provide high quality, faster-better-friendlier service consistent with the needs and beliefs, of our patients, employees, visitors and vendors in a comfortable, secure environment. 3.0: Vision: To be the multi-specialty clinics and surgical hospital of choice for patients, employees and community doctors in UAE. 4.0: Core Values: Honesty Customer Focus and patient safety Respect and Collegiality Teamwork, productivity and efficiency Leadership with accountability Loyalty 2. Describe the change you hope to implement. What is the current situation? What is the desired situation? How are you going to achieve it? 3. Why is this change needed? Please discuss how you analysed the need for change within your organisation / department /team. Include as an appendix any tools you used to help you in this analysis. 4. Discuss the organisational impact you hope the change will have and describe the expected outcome(s). 5. Discuss the potential threats or obstacles to implementing this change. 6. Outline your proposed method(s) of evaluating this change. How will you demonstrate that you have achieved your expected outcomes described in Section 4 above? 7. Describe your role in your organisation and also your role as you see it in this change project (i.e. what will you be responsible for and what will others be responsible for in bringing about your proposed change)? 8. Include an appendix with the expected main phases of work and timelines (mini Gantt Chart). (to be attached) 9. Is there literature available related to your chosen topic? Please list 4 to 7 references to demonstrate you have conducted an initial literature search.
21 July, 2015
Brazil, Russia, India, China, Korea, Bangladesh, Costa Rica, Egypt, Finland, Peru, Portugal, Romania, Thailand, or Vietnam.
20 July, 2015
Ethical Dilemmas Order Description Ethical considerations are increasingly important in the practice of marketing research. For the first week, you will consider six ethical dilemmas confronting marketing research practitioners. In this unit's study, you read Case 1-3, Ethical Dilemmas in Marketing Research, from page 28 in your Marketing Research text. For this assignment, review the case, paying particular attention to the situation and identified issues. Based on what you have learned from your reading in this unit and from your review of the case, prepare a report 2–4 pages long in which you do the following: •Determine key criteria for evaluating ethical situations. •Evaluate the key ethical dilemma in each scenario. •Develop recommendations related to improving ethical research and reporting. •Include justification that supports the recommended process or approach. Make sure to identify each scenario as a separate section of your paper. Books Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., Leone, R. P., & Day, G. S. (2013). Marketing research (11th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. ISBN: 9781118156636. Ethical Dilemmas Scoring Guide Grading Rubric Criteria Non-performance Basic Proficient Distinguished Determine key criteria for evaluating ethical situations. 25% Does not determine criteria for evaluating ethical situations. Identifies some criteria for evaluating ethical situations, or criteria are not appropriate for specific scenarios. Determines key criteria for evaluating ethical situations. Determines key criteria for evaluating ethical situations; explains why these criteria are more suitable than others. Evaluate the key ethical dilemma in each scenario. 25% Does not identify the key ethical dilemma in each scenario. Identifies or summarizes the ethical dilemma, but does not provide an evaluation. Evaluates the key ethical dilemma in each scenario. Evaluates the key ethical dilemma in each scenario; demonstrates insight into the core issues. Develop recommendations related to improving ethical research and reporting. 25% Does not develop recommendations related to improving ethical research and reporting. Makes some recommendations, but does not relate to overall improvements to ethical research and reporting. Develops recommendations related to improving ethical research and reporting. Develops recommendations related to improving ethical research and reporting; describes consequences of not making improvements. Include justification that supports the recommended process or approach. 25% Does not include justification that supports the recommended process or approach. Includes some references or examples relevant to ethics, but does not support recommendations or decisions. Includes justification that supports the recommended process or approach. Includes justification that supports the recommended process or approach; utilizes scholarly sources or examples.
20 July, 2015