chose apple product zalzaid

need you to do my essay and this is what the professor wrote : Technology Research Prompt • Argumentative essay: defend a position on a topic using different evidence such as personal experience, literature, historical examples, and research to support his or her view • Topic: Something in technology that interest you and how it has effected society or cultural change or education or relationships of any kind or economy, positively and or negatively (evaluate various sides of the issue) • 3 to 5 pages • At least 3 sources up to as many as you want, to help prove your point on the topic of your choice • Your own interpretation or judgment that includes claims based on well-reasoned insight • Examples: Apple products, Apps, Social Media sites, Blogging, Video Games, T.V., Advertising, texting, Program, Website, Device, Social Identity, Sports, Military, Ethics, Morality, Vehicle enhancement, Crime, Internet Crime, DeepWeb, Employment, Jobs, etc… *please use very easy words and dont use words that are hard. please chose a good and simple technology. thanks PLEASE CHOSE APPLE PRODUCT Name: Professor: Subject: Date: Apple’s iPhones are better than Samsung’s Galaxys Is it iPhones or Galaxys? There has been an ongoing and unending competition between Apple’s iPhones and Samsung’s Galaxy smartphones. Why? Some factions of the public admit that they are die-hard fans of iPhones (Menard et al. 986). Other factions, on the other hand, prefer Galaxys over iPhones. So, which is which? Even if they are both great smartphones, there are distinctive characteristics that place latest iPhones (iPhone 6 models) on the forefront of the competition as opposed to Galaxys (Galaxy S5 models). This argumentative paper seeks to show that iPhones are better than Galaxys. The paper is positioned to achieve its objectives by considering two distinctive characteristics, namely, data navigator, and durability, coupled with camera quality. First and foremost, iPhones surpass Galaxys in terms of data navigator. iPhones have Siri as their data navigator that is superior to Galaxys’ S Voice. It is important to recognize that data navigator is also known as knowledge finder (Mossberg 2). In simple words, a knowledge finder refers to software that allows a person to search for all kinds of data stored inside and outside a computerized communication device. What makes Siri superior to S Voice is that, unlike the latter, the former does not require specific introductory remarks to launch its data search process. One can commandeer a data search process by talking right away after clicking the on-start button. This means that anyone can use an iPhone, including technology-savvy children (Menard et al. 987). Unfortunately, S Voice needs more than just a simple click of a button. After clicking the on-start button, it requires one to state specific words, that is, “Hi Galaxy,” in order to commandeer the data search process by voice. By comparing the two data navigators, Siri is easier and faster to use when compared to S Voice. In addition, Siri’s data search process is more insightful than that of S Voice. How? For instance, when one inquires, “who was the twenty-third United States’ President? Siri provides all necessary details concerning the given inquiry, such as the name, presidency time span, and major achievements, among other details. But, in regards to the afore-mentioned inquiry, the S Voice is inclined to provide the name only. This makes iPhones more applicable in diverse fields. In a nutshell, iPhones’ Siri gives it an upper hand over Galaxys’ S Voice. That is why Iphones are better than Galaxys. iPhones are also superior to Galaxys based on their durability and quality cameras (Goggin 233). In a YouTube-featured drop test, iPhones provided recommendable results as opposed to Galaxys. The drop test involved three drops of the given phones from an upward distance of four feet. The three drops characterized, first, the back drop, followed by the corner drop, and lastly, the front drop. At the end of the three drops, the screens of the Galaxys tended to break after the second drop, while those of iPhones tended to break after the third drop. Is this not enough to prove that iPhones are more durable than Galaxys? Of course it is a reason that is adequate to pronounce the superiority of iPhones (West and Mace 272). If that is not all, iPhones have tremendous camera qualities that exceed those present in Galaxys. For instance, iPhones’ cameras can capture panoramic pictures (which consist of wide and horizontal images). That is something Galaxys’ cameras cannot achieve. It is necessary to understand that panoramic pictures are required in situations that include a large crowd of people or people standing in long lines (Goggin 235). Besides, panoramic features, iPhones’ cameras are equipped with a natural outlook. This means that iPhones’ pictures appear more natural when compared to Galaxys’ pictures that appear more artificial. So, durability, together with camera quality, makes iPhones superb than Galaxys. However, critics of iPhones argue that Galaxys are highly expensive and most of their features are useless (West and Mace 273). Basing on their argument, one can consider that the critics are right to a certain extend. In fact, latest iPhones’ prices range from 200 US dollars, through 400 US dollars up to 1000 US dollars. They have prices that many people cannot afford, especially the low income earners. A good smartphone is supposed to have consumer-desired features, but at the same time cost affordably. That is what Galaxys are meant for. They are not only packed with consumer-desired features, but they are also consumer friendly when it comes to their prices. This grants Galaxys superiority over iPhones. But, iPhones’ critics are overly wrong. Why? This is because; as noted earlier, iPhones are packaged with superior features that rival those presented by Galaxys. Take for instance the superiority shown by the data navigation software (Siri), durability and camera quality of iPhones. All these are characteristics that people expect in every smartphone in the current and future world (Shih, Lakhani, and Nagy 4). This reveals that iPhones are not only made to satisfy current needs, but they also equipped with next generation features. One of the key next generation features is the finger print scanner that is innate in all latest iPhones. The scanner provides maximal protection of iPhones against invasion of privacy and unnecessary theft. There is nothing more that matters to people like their devices’ privacy and safety. Therefore, if features are not ‘up-to-perfection’ in Galaxys, there is no way that they can cost higher than iPhones. In other words, iPhones are relatively expensive than Galaxys for a good reason only. The good reason is that iPhones’ features are superior to those of Galaxys and other smartphones. Such features diversify and magnify the usability of all iPhones in diverse fields of knowledge (Hayes 17). This makes the cost of making iPhones higher than that of making Galaxys thereby rendering iPhones pricy as opposed to Galaxys. From this explanation, one thing is clear. iPhones’ expensive nature is justified. The justification renders critics’ argument as overly wrong and vague to the subject matter. As conclusive remarks, there is no more competition between iPhones and Galaxys based on the argument presented by the paper. iPhones are better than Galaxys due to the fact that, first, they perform data search effectively and efficiently via Siri in comparison to Galaxys’ S Voice. Second, they are durable, coupled with the evidence that show iPhones have better camera qualities that are characterized by natural and panoramic pictures. Even if critics of iPhones render Galaxys cheaper than iPhones in terms of affordability, superior features of iPhones are behind their expensiveness. So, there is no denial that people are inclined to prefer iPhones over Galaxys in one way or another. That is the reason why there is sheer evidence about numerous significances of iPhones that surpass those of Galaxys. Works Cited Goggin, Gerard. "Adapting the mobile phone: The iPhone and its consumption." Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 23.2 (2009): 231-244. Hayes, Tim. "Next-generation cell phone cameras." Optics and Photonics News 23.2 (2012): 16-21. Menard, Timothy, et al. "Comparing the GPS capabilities of the Samsung Galaxy S, Motorola Droid X, and the Apple iPhone for vehicle tracking using FreeSim_Mobile." Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2011. (985-990). Mossberg, Walt. "The iPhone finds its voice." Coluna pessoal de Tecnologia. The Wall Street Journal 12 (2011): 1-4. Shih, George, Paras Lakhani, and Paul Nagy. "Is android or iPhone the platform for innovation in imaging informatics." Journal of Digital Imaging 23.1 (2010): 2-7. West, Joel, and Michael Mace. "Browsing as the killer app: Explaining the rapid success of Apple's iPhone." Telecommunications Policy 34.5 (2010): 270-286.