Personal Managerial Effectiveness

Personal Managerial Effectiveness The subject of the paper is Personal Managerial Effectiveness Please do read the coursework briefly & very very CAREFULLY and till the very end it explains every thing about how the assignment has to be done and how the essay report should be presented. Using relevant examples drawn from the modern corporate world, critically evaluate the suitability or otherwise of the Hofstede’s 5 Dimensions Framework to the successful management of a cross-cultural workplace. The report should include discussion about • Introduce students to issues and perspectives in diversity and develop a critical understanding that diversity is not a problem to be managed away, but rather an opportunity to develop greater personal and organisational effectiveness. • increase self-awareness in terms of personal perspectives about diversity issues • develop an increased sense of one’s own discretionary power as a person and as a manager to deal effectively and constructively with the opportunities and challenges of diversity to gain strategic/competitive advantage Please follow the instructions in the coursework brief very carefully which I'll be attaching and make the essay accordingly. The Index page should be according to the coursework brief And the word limit provided excludes the table of contents and the bibliography list which will be attached in the bottom. The word counts starts from Introduction and ends at Conclusion. Indicative Assessment Requirements for the Module;- Using relevant examples drawn from the modern corporate world, critically evaluatethe suitability or otherwise of the Hofstede’s 5 Dimensions Framework to the successful management of a cross-cultural workplace. Include in your report 4 justified recommendations drawn from the discussion of your report’s findings. Include the following sub-topics in your report; • A title page • An executive summary • An introduction • Literature review • Discussion and analysis • Conclusion • Recommendations • References • Bibliography ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maximum Word Limit and Assessment weighting: • Word Limit – The total word limit is 3000 words. • Weightage – 50% of the module ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description of Assessment Requirements • All assignments must be word processed – handwritten assignments will attract an automatic FAIL grade. • The assignment should be in a report format. • Assignments will be graded on the basis of research done, analysis of the facts collated, stand taken and the justification of the stand. • All research must be referenced using the Harvard Style of Referencing and a Reference and Bibliography list attached. Improper or lack of either of these constitutes plagiarism and students will be awarded a Zero. • Students found copying from other students will also be charged with collusion and awarded a Zero. Assessment Criteria Introduction-coverage of background of the topic. (10 marks maximum) ? Weak coverage with little or no justification: 1-3 ? Satisfactory coverage with some justification: 4-7 ? Good coverage with good justification: 8-10 Review of the related literature-Collection of data from a range of sources (25 marks maximum) ? Little or no evidence of data: 1-9 ? Satisfactory range of sources: 10-16 ? Excellent range of sources: 17-25 Analysis and evaluation (25 marks maximum) ? Weak analysis with little or no evaluation: 1-9 ? Satisfactory analysis with some evaluation: 10-16 ? Good analysis with good evaluation: 17-25 Conclusions and Recommendations to management (20 marks) ? Poor recommendations with little or no justification: 1-7 ? Satisfactory recommendations with some justification: 8-13 ? Good recommendations with good justification: 14-20 Presentation, argument and Harvard referencing (20 marks maximum) ? Poor presentation, poorly structured argument and poor Harvard referencing: 1-7 ? Satisfactory presentation, logically structured argument and satisfactory Harvard referencing: 8-13 ? Good presentation, logically structured argument and satisfactory Harvard referencing: 14-20 TOTAL MARK: 100 % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Module Learning Outcomes to be Assessed:- • Introduce students to issues and perspectives in diversity and develop a critical understanding that diversity is not a problem to be managed away, but rather an opportunity to develop greater personal and organisational effectiveness. • increase self-awareness in terms of personal perspectives about diversity issues • develop an increased sense of one’s own discretionary power as a person and as a manager to deal effectively and constructively with the opportunities and challenges of diversity to gain strategic/competitive advantage