Poster, about Health financie system in Australia

Assignment: 1. The context • The National Health Council, which is chaired by the Minister of Health, recently passed Resolution 6 of 2015. This states the need for an increase in the financial resources in the health sector. The resolution notes that this expansion can be based on both public and private funding and should respect the criteria of equity with particular attention being paid to the health and health care needs of the households with low-incomes. • You are working in the Division of Health Planning in the Ministry of Health. • The country referred to is a country of your own choice and can be classified as low income, middle-income, or high-income. 2. The task: Here my supervisor advise me to do this things: please if you need any more info just let me know We are fine with your country choice Australia. As you can focus on only one financing option I would recommend to focus on the government run health financing system of medicare and look at the equity impact for the lower-income groups of various additional financing measures for the public (such as additional payments or insurances for these). You are required to develop a poster to be displayed to the National Health Council to explore the options regarding community financing, social insurance, private insurance, and tax-based financing. The terms of reference are: ‘to review one of the four options of health care funding. You will need to assess its appropriateness in increasing financial resources and expanding health service provision within the country context. It is important that the review considers the impact on equity with attention being paid to the health care needs of the low-income households.’ My task as my supervisor wants like this the country I had chosen is Australia and please cover the point that he is mention about it. We are fine with your country choice Australia. As you can focus on only one financing option I would recommend to focus on the government-run health financing system of medicare and look at the equity impact for the lower-income groups of various additional financing measures for the public (such as additional payments or insurances for these). Assessment Rubric for a Poster Assignment PART A: Knowledge and Understanding Distinction 70-100% Merit 60-69% Pass 50-59% Fail 0-49% Background Cover 15% of total mark Clearly defines the topic and explains its significance Innovative and extensive use of informative, current and relevant literature Clearly defines the topic. Extensive use of informative, current and relevant literature. Defines the topic Not always the most informative, current or relevant literature sources Does not clearly define the topic Literature irrelevant, out-of-date or missing Discussion / explanation of findings Cover 25% of total mark Discussion is coherent and succinct with extensive critical analysis Explicit reference is made to aims & objectives Synthesises and evaluates existing ideas to derive original insights. Critical awareness of strengths and limitations Discussion is coherent and succinct with some critical analysis Reference is made to aims & objectives Synthesises existing ideas with some ability to derive new insights Awareness of most key strengths and limitations Discussion is generally coherent but critical analysis is limited Reference to aims & objectives may be inferred but is not explicitly stated Synthesises existing ideas but limited ability to derive new insights. Some awareness of strengths and limitations Discussions lacks coherence and critical analysis Little/no reference is made to aims & objectives Little ability to synthesise ideas Little/no awareness of strengths and limitations Conclusions / Recommendations Cover 20% of total mark Recommendations incorporate all relevant criteria and contextual factors and are within appropriate resource limits Insightful, well-supported conclusions / recommendations that flow logically from the work presented Recommendations incorporate most relevant criteria and contextual factors and are within appropriate resource limits Well-supported conclusions / recommendations that flow logically from the work presented Recommendations incorporate most relevant criteria and contextual factors but require minor modification to bring them within appropriate resource limits Conclusions / recommendations are generally valid and supported by the work presented but may be limited in scope Recommendations take insufficient account of relevant criteria and contextual factors and have unrealistic resource expectations Conclusions / recommendations are generally not supported by the work presented and/or are very limited in scope PART B: Presentation Presentation and layout Cover 20% of total mark All expected sections are present and formatted as required Layout is very easy to follow in the absence of the presenter The main ideas are communicated very clearly in a logically sequenced argument Poster is visual appealing with excellent use of colour, fonts and images Text is concise, clear and free of spelling or typographical errors. Figures and tables are appropriate, explained in the text, labelled correctly and sources are given References are presented appropriately All expected sections are present and mostly formatted as required Layout is easy to follow in the absence of the presenter The main ideas are communicated clearly in a logically sequenced argument, Poster is visual appealing with good use of colour, fonts and images Text is clear with only very minor spelling and typographical errors Figures and tables are appropriate, explained in the text, labelled correctly and sources are given References are presented appropriately Most expected sections are present but formatting may be deficient in places Layout is not obvious to follow in the absence of the presenter The main ideas are reasonably well communicated Use of colour, fonts and images is distracting in places and lessens the visual appeal Text is clear but marred by spelling and typographical errors Figures and tables are not always well chosen or explained in the text. Labels may be inadequate and sources not always given References are generally presented appropriately Some expected sections are present but with little / no attention to required format Layout is confusing to follow in the absence of the presenter The main ideas are inadequately communicated Poster is visually unappealing due to poor use of colour, fonts and images Text lacks clarity and contains multiple spelling and typographical errors Figures and tables are poorly chosen or not explained in the text. Labels are poor and sources are not given. References are not presented in the required format Oral presentation Cover 20% of total mark Holds attention of audience with consistent direct eye contact Poster is used as a talking point, not read aloud Delivery is clear, audible and well-paced within the time limit Demonstrates broad knowledge by answering questions with full explanation and elaboration. Generally maintains eye contact with the audience Poster is generally used as a talking point, not read aloud Delivery is clear, audible and well-paced within the time limit At ease with answering questions with full explanation but without elaboration. Limited eye contact with audience Poster is generally read aloud Delivery is not always audible and/or pace is inappropriate Uncomfortable with the information and able to answer only rudimentary questions. Limited or no eye contact with audience Poster is read aloud Delivery is not always audible and pace is inappropriate Limited grasp of information and cannot answer questions.