Order Description Article Assignments Format Requirements All assignments should: 1.Be composed of all three sections: Executive Summary, Critical Thinking Questions, and Critique ?Each sections should start on a new page with the section title entered and bolded (i.e., Executive Summary, Critical Thinking Questions, and then Critique) 2.Include the name of the article you are addressing in the header 3.Be at least 1200 words 4.Be double-spaced 5.Have 1-inch margins 6.Use 12-point Time New Roman font 7.Adhere to APA standards for citations and formatting Article Assignment Content Requirements A.Executive Summary: The Executive Summary is a synopsis of the article – no opinions in this section. You are required to include a summary of all the key points of the article. The length of the Executive Summary will vary from article to article, but should be accomplish in approximately 300-600 words. B.Critical Thinking Questions: Following your Executive Summary, please answer the Critical Thinking Questions at the end of the article. You are required to use evidence from the article to answer the questions. You may also include any outside courses you deem relevant (i.e. journal articles, newspapers, magazines, or online sources). Again, be sure to use APA style to do so. The length of critical thinking question portion will vary from article to article, but should be accomplished in approximately 300-600 words. C.Critique: Each Critical Thinking portion should be followed by a Critique. The Critique is a critical analysis of the article. This is appropriate section for your professional opinion; for you to apply what you have learned from your management courses as well as from any management experience you may have. In this section, you are required to include at least ONE piece of from previous classes, textbooks, outside articles (scholarly or newspaper/popular press). You may also use evidence from your workplace. Again, the length will vary from article to article, but critiques should be accomplished in approximately 600-900 words.
06 November, 2015
Order Description write a rhetorical analysis essay on “Your E-Book is Reading You” by Alexandra Alter The link is given as http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304870304577490950051438304 How to Proceed with the Rhetorical Analysis Decide on an approach to your essay. You can focus on either the content of the article or on its rhetorical methods and style (examining how the text persuades its readers). If you choose to focus on the content of an article, be careful to avoid the trap of stepping away from rhetorical analysis. The article has to be at the forefront of your discussion at all times. If you choose to focus on the article’s rhetorical methods and style, visit the University of British Columbia Writers’ Workshop segment called “Rhetorical Analysis: Critical Writing” the link is given https://cstudies.ubc.ca/student-information/services/self-directed-writing-resources/rhetorical-analysis/critical-reading Review the guidelines provided to you in the textbook’s chapters on critical and rhetorical analysis, as well as on the checklist below, but note this: In your analysis, you will report on the rhetorical techniques the writer uses to support his or her thesis. Your job is NOT to mark the essay or article, NOT to write a review of the essay or article, just to analyze its rhetoric. The key to a good rhetorical analysis is to discover and report on how the writer gets the message to the reader. Follow the FOUR D’s outlined below for every technique you choose to discuss. Discover the technique. Define the technique (as necessary). For help with this, Google “Rhetorical Devices.” Describe the writer’s use of the technique by including at least three examples (quotations) of each, making sure to integrate them properly. Discuss the writer’s probable motive for the technique and its impact on the reader. Decide how you are going to limit your analysis. Consider limiting your discussion to as little as one technique per body paragraph. Create a Works Cited or References page, and as we have reminded you previously, do not guess, and do not use a software program. Checklist for Rhetorical Analysis Essay After you have completed your analysis, use the checklist below to evaluate how well you have done. Did you use MLA or APA guidelines to format your essay? Did you check your formatting against examples in the textbook or on the Purdue Online Writing Lab site? (See this unit’s lesson for links.) Did you introduce the reading by identifying the author, the title, and the subject matter? Did you put the title of the essay in quotation marks? Did you include a summary of the article following your sentence of introduction? Is your thesis the last sentence of the first paragraph, or do you have a good reason it is not? Did you consider including an essay map/preview statement with your thesis sentence? (Speak to your tutor or see item #2 in Lesson 1 for further information.) Have you used third person point of view throughout? If not, do you have a good reason you didn’t? Check and make sure you have not shifted into first-person or second-person point of view. Does each paragraph have a topic sentence with at least two supporting points and a conclusion? Did you use a transitional word, phrase or sentence at the beginning of each body paragraph? Did you use transitional words and phrases as necessary to connect sentences within your paragraphs? Did you follow all the assignment parameters? Did you include quotations from the article? As you did so, did you follow the four required steps? Did you check each use of research to determine whether you integrated it? Did you make sure that no paragraph (excepting the conclusion) ends with a quotation? Does your in-text citation properly match the corresponding Works Cited or References entry? Check this very carefully—remember that the first word of the citation has to match the first word of the corresponding entry. Did you make sure to do your in-text and Works Cited or References entries correctly? Did you check each citation word for word and punctuation for punctuation against an example from the textbook, the Purdue Online Writing, or another reputable up-to-date source? Did you create a suggestive, emphatic conclusion rather than one in which you unnecessarily repeat the main supporting points? Di
06 November, 2015