Leadership vision 2 The purposes of this assignment are to: a) identify and articulate key concepts of your leadership vision, b) provide empirical, scholarly evidence to support your position, and c) communicate ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner. A source is scholarly when it • comes from a professional, peer-reviewed publication (e.g., a journal or a government report such as from the FDA or CDC); • contains references for sources cited, so you can find the original source of information; • is written by a professional or scholar in the field and indicates credentials of the author(s); and • is no more than 5 years old You are to take 3 scholarly articles less than 5 years old and critique them based upon the instruction below. Please set paper according to the format below with introduction, vision concepts, evidence, examples and conclusion. 1: Introduction Introduction clearly introduces your vision. 2: Vision Concepts Identification of key concepts of vision is articulated clearly with no inaccuracy. 3: Evidence Empirical, scholarly evidence supporting your vision is clearly critiqued. 4: Examples Specific examples clearly demonstrate the impact or importance of your vision of nursing. 5: Conclusion Concluding statements summarizing content are present and accurate The following are some questions you may want to address in your critique no matter what type of article you are critiquing. (Keep in mind: these items don’t have to be discussed in this order and some may not be pertinent to your specific article.) If your assignment is a short paper, you may choose a few items to include in your critique as you see fit and have room. 1. Is the title of the article appropriate and clear? 2. Is the abstract specific and representative of the article? 3. Is the purpose of the article made clear in the introduction? 5. Is all of the discussion relevant? 6. Has the author cited the literature? 7. Have any ideas been overemphasized or underemphasized? 8. Should some sections of the manuscript be expanded, condensed, or omitted? 9. Are the author’s statements clear? 10. What underlying assumptions does the author have? 11. Has the author been objective in his or her discussion of the topic?
09 November, 2015
Congnitive Psychology-Essentialism and Racial Bias Jointly Contribute to the Categorization of Multiracial Individuals Paper AssignmentPaper Due: 2pm WedNovember11, 2015on CToolsReviews Due: 2pm WedNovember 25, 2015on CToolsRevision Due:Your paper should do three things: (1) motivate and explain the question and hypotheses being addressed in the article, incorporating relevant information that we have covered in the class (why is the question important, how does it fit with other information you’ve learned), (2) describe the research in the article you read(e.g., independent & dependent variables, results), and (3) summarize the implications of the work(e.g., what hypothesis does it support or rule out). The goal is to give you some exposure to actual research in cognitive psychology and to explore one topic from the course in more depth.You’re welcome to do additional research on your topic beyond the material covered in the course, but that isn’t required
09 November, 2015
leadership (international business) This assignment will assess your knowledge and understanding of the leadership process and the challenges faced by those who lead on a global basis. It can be argued that global leadership differs from domestic leadership in degree in terms of issues related to connectedness, boundary spanning, complexity, ethical challenges, dealing with tensions and paradoxes, pattern recognition, and building learning environments, teams, and community and leading large-scale change efforts – across diverse cultures. (Osland and Bird, 2006:123) Critically evaluate the perception that global leadership and traditional (domestic) leadership are in essence the same concept notice: please this is so important which the plagiarism should NOT more than 10%
08 November, 2015